Rather than sending mere letters of protest to SEA, why not simply try to overload it with litigation? Can you imagine the cost of trying to stamp out every "misuse" of its "trademark" in every forum in the country? Such challenges should not merely be mailed to SEA, but should be publicly posted on computer bulletin boards from one end of the country to the other, submitted to trade publications, and generally given the widest possible circulation so that SEA will feel compelled to take action. A suggested form follows: --------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Thom L. Henderson, President System Enhancement Associates, Inc. 21 New Street Wayne, New Jersey 07470 Dear Mr. Henderson: You are hereby expressly invited to sue me in the United States Dis- trict Court for the ________ District of ____ in __________, ____, for infringing your alleged trademark of "ARC" and all its various derivatives. I have wantonly, willfully, deliberately, repeatedly, openly, and notoriously used the words "arc," "arced," "unarc," "un- arced," "arcing," "unarcing," and every other noun, pronoun, verb, adverb, adjective, conjunction, preposition, or other part of speech of the English language that could conceivably be formed from the word "arc" to describe processes of data file compression and extrac- tion commonly known as "archiving." Moreover, I have every intention of continuing to do so at every opportunity and in every form of com- munication available to me, distributed in every imaginable way, in- cluding, without limitation, that which may be obtainable on payment of a fee or be included with a product or service which is obtainable on payment of a fee or for which a fee is requested. Sincerely,